Wherever there is RNA in living
organisms - DExH/D proteins are likely to be involved. |

| SF2
proteins included in the DExH/D database.The sequence
requirements for inclusion are listed and discussed
below. (This schematics should not be considered a
phylogenetic tree!) |
| SF2 helicases contain several conserved "helicase domains" (Gorbalenya & Koonin, Curr. Opin. Struct, Biol. 3, 419-429; 1993): |
| Conserved
"helicase domains". Capital letters indicate
highly conserved aminoacids, small letters more frequent
conservative substitutions. x represents variable
residues but indicates important spacings between
conserved positions. The sequence in the Walker II motif
provided the name for DEAD, DExH, and DEAH subgroups. The
boxes underneath the sequence indicate the functional
role of the motifs derived from X-ray structures and
mutational analysis. |
| While many SF2 proteins have a DExH or a DEAH signature in their Walker-II motif, only a smaller subset has the conserved regions for DExH/D proteins: |
motifs...................I..............Ia................Ib...............Ic.................II............III................IV...........................V........Va......................VI.......
DEAH_group....LP....GETGSGKTTQxxQ....TQPRRVAA....RVxxE....VGYxIRF....TxxxYxTDGxLL....LxxY....DEAHERxxxTD....SAT....GRxxPV....LVFxxG....QxxxF....RxxVxATNIAETSLTIxGxxYVxDxGxxKxxxY....S....QRxGRxGRxxxxG...
DEAD_group............TGTGKTxxF........PTRELAxQ...........GG...............TPG.............VxDEAD...........SAT..............VIF...........F...............RGL............................HRxGRxGR........
DExH_group............TGxGKTxxxL.......PxxAL...............................T...............VxDExH...........SAT................FxxS...........................T......VID..................QRxGRxGR........
SNF2_group............MGxGKT...........P...................................................IxDExH...........TGT................FxxM...........................T...........................QAxDRxHR........
RAD3_group............SGxGKT...............................................................VxDExH...........SGT................FxxS.......................................................QCxGRxLR........
UL9__group............MGxGKT...............................................................VxDExx...........DAT................FxxT...........................T...........................QSxGRxRT........
| Characteristic
motifs were identified from alignments of 30 DEAH, ca. 40
DEAD, and ca. 40 DExH proteins. (Alignments of more
proteins in each group might slighly alter the ratio
between identical and conservative substituted residues
as well as the alignments of the conserved motifs for the
different groups). The numbering of the motifs is
according to Gorbalenya and Koonin, (Curr. Opin.
Struct, Biol. 3, 419-429; 1993);
motifs Ib, Ic, and Va are named by myself. Red letters
represent identical amino acids, blue letters
conservative substitutions. The points separating the
conserved motifs do not represent
spacings between the motifs. However, aligned amino acids
from the different groups have comparable distance. The
conserved motifs are usually surrounded by a cluster of
less, but still significant conserved residues which are
not indicated here. Single conserved residues in the
sequence should be seen in light of this. Similarity
within the DEAH-group continues throughout the
C-terminus. For comparison, I have aligned sequences of other SF2 proteins in order to emphasize differences. While those might seem small, there is work suggesting that these differences matter quite a bit as conserved motifs do not play the same role in all SF2 proteins. |
Inspection of the given motifs shows that the sequence of motif II alone does not sufficiently indicate whether a protein is actually a member of the DEAD, DExH, or DEAH group. Many SF2 proteins feature a "misleading" motif II but are clearly missing or significantly different in other motifs. (To further illustrate this fact: Some (viral) DExH proteins have actually a DEAH-motif II. Also, several other SF2 proteins have a DEAH-motif II, but are far from beeing DEAH proteins. And finally, there are some restriction enzymes with a DEAD-motif but with clear divergence in (almost all) other motifs.) Thus, DExH or DEAH are rather misnomers which, however, are kept for historical reasons (until one comes up with another catchy description). The reason to combine DEAD, DEAH and DExH proteins is their predominant involvement in RNA related processes justifying the discrimination between DExH/D and other SF2 helicases (Staley & Guthrie, Cell 90, 1041-1050, 1998). However, there are exceptions (like in probably every classification), most notably the RecQ-like DExH proteins which are clearly DNA helicases. For consistency, these proteins are included in the database. DExH/D proteins are often called "putative RNA helicases", based on the observation that some protein family members are actually RNA helicases: they unwind duplex RNA duplexes (more then 26 DExH/D proteins have been shown to be RNA helicases). This activity requires energy provided by binding and/or hydrolysis of NTPs. All DExH/D proteins which have been subject to biochemical analysis were found to hydrolyze NTP. In most cases, this activity is stimulated by nucleic acids. How DExH/D proteins exactly perform the helicase activity, i.e. how they transform the energy of NTP hydrolysis and/or binding into mechanical (conformational) work on RNA remains to be shown. |
[About the Database] [Search the Database]
[DExH/D
Protein Links] [Contact the
Author] [Home]
Copyright © 1999 Eckhard
Jankowsky